
It doesn’t focus on economics or entrepreneurship, though the economy is a critical element to the story. Nor are the lessons to be drawn from the book narrowly focused on economic morals. Eric Blair, a/k/a George Orwell, was actually a socialist, so it comes as some surprise that the book really isn’t a capitalism-bashing tale, and perhaps that is one of its real strengths.
Of course, given Orwell’s background, this also isn’t a treatise on the importance of entrepreneurship to society or the economy (although it did make me wonder whether “all entrepreneurs are equal” or some are “more equal than others,” but I’ll save that thought for another day).
You can analyze this parable on any number of levels and in various contexts (the most obvious being that this is a simplified overview of the history of the Soviet Union in the early 20th century), but for those of us living in the post-9/11 world there are still lessons to be learned.
Sure, Orwell is ridiculing totalitarian states. But, if you read a bit more closely, you can also discern a subtle warning about the insidious threat posed by apathy in a democratic society. After all, it doesn’t take much to move the sheep from “Four legs good, two legs bad” to “Four legs good, two legs better.”
No comments :
Post a Comment